The Fantastic Four

[J.R.K]

In this episode Jay Feldman, Mike Fave and Danny Roddy are joined by Georgi Dinkov, as they discuss the bio energetic position on estrogen and the recent criticisms of this position.

[Cari]

@J.R.L Since estrogen has been proven to be carcinogenic and promotes cancer then why do you think it is prescribed often to women?

[J.R.K]

Thanks for the question Cari. I wish that there would be a concrete solid answer as to why estrogen is prescribed to women. There is this belief that estrogen is heart protective, and that estrogen production is reduced as women age, hence the idea that the menopause is caused by a lack of estrogen. This is true if you are looking strictly at blood samples, the levels do decrease as we age. But a Chinese study looked at tissue samples and discovered that the rates were much much higher and progesterone levels were significantly lower in older females. But this phenomenon of aging is not limited to females, in fact as males age the levels of estrogen rise to levels equivalent and in some cases higher than their female counterparts.

The prescription of estrogen may have something to do with the fact that higher levels of estrogen are seen in all metabolic syndrome related diseases. As was demonstrated with Goldman Sachs denouncing Gilead sciences after they announced the cure to Hepatitis C. Curing people is not a viable business plan, because you will lose revenues compared to managing symptoms and side effects.

Another possible reason might also be that the production of estrogen is more cost effective than bioavailable progesterone or pregnenalone for the pharmaceutical industry. Note specifically on bioavailable, the synthetic progestins are in my opinion equivalently or worse than estrogen supplementation. In some countries the bioavailable forms of these two pro hormones is available over the counter.
Given that there are so many different ways we are exposed to estrogen in our environment, not to mention that every cell in our body is capable of producing estrogen in the event of injury or excessive stress of one form or another, the prescription of estrogen is in my opinion redundant and given the effects of chronically elevated estrogen actually dangerous. An example of this would be the long term side effects of contraceptive’s that are estrogen based. In reality these drugs do not prevent pregnancy but work by terminating the fertilized ovum, if my understanding is correct.

[Zack-Vegas]

“Since estrogen has been proven to be carcinogenic and promotes cancer then why do you think it is prescribed often to women?”

Because the prescribing is done by agents of the Medical Industry/Cartel, and they have shown a complete disregard for human life and health over the last century, at least (probably dates back much further).

This is the exact same industry that currently puts children on puberty blockers and mutilates them with gender affirming surgeries.  It routinely practices circumcision on infants, killing at least 100 healthy babies in the US each year, and never getting the direct consent of the infant.  It prescribes SSRIs to people suffering from depression, which makes them four times more likely to commit suicide.  It administers the covid 19 shots, none of which have gone through the standard drug safety trials, have shown alarming rates of side effects, including death, showed only a 1.5% absolute risk reduction (at best) for the condition they claim to treat, and are prescribed for something that is simply the common cold plus pneumonia.  It prescribes finasteride and dutasteride to men, despite the known sexual and depression related side effects.  It blasts cancer patients with chemotherapy and radiation, which themselves probably have little evidence to back them up.  It routinely performs “bypass surgery,” on heart patients, despite the fact that randomized trials have shown no benefit to such surgery over drug treatment.  And it used ventilator protocols for Covid patients that had a lethality rate of 97%, which is higher than the most lethal form of suicide (by gun), which is “only” 82%, by comparison.  It recommends roughly 72 doses of vaccines for children from age 0-18, which itself shows that the industry and it’s agents are never averse to experimenting on children, either through “official trials,” or just loading the little ones up with any sort of dangerous concoction they can think of, and then randomly shooting them up (similar to how heroin is usually taken), often times with up to six doses in a single session.

Those are only recent examples, all of which are still regularly happening.  There are plenty of other historic atrocities, too.  Like electro shock therapy, the radiation experiments, the Tuskeegee experiments, lobotomies (which even claimed Rosemary Kennedy of the Kennedy family as a victim),  the MK Ultra experiments, torture techniques like “psychic driving” and “depatterning” developed by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron (and those torture techniques were so effective, they have continued to be used for decades after his death).

This is far from a complete list, just the ones that easily come to my mind.

[J.R.K]

There is of course as <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Zac”>@Zack Vegas</span> so aptly described the fact that the medical establishment is infested with psychopaths, and by extension the captured regulatory bodies that are to be the gatekeepers for the pharmaceutical and medical device  industries.

One question <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Za”>@Zack Vegas</span>.

The high ninety seven percent mortality rates seen with intubation that you mentioned. Is that strictly based upon the bacterial pneumonia and subsequent sepsis that are seen in this procedure . Or does the addition of Remdesivir as part of the hospital COVID-19 protocols and the subsequent renal failure factor into this number?

[Zack-Vegas]

From my understanding, the 97% number comes from the early days of the Covid Operation, around April 2020.  Remdesivir wasn’t in wide use at that time, but still could have been used with some patients.  I think it was mostly a result from the ventilators themselves, as well as the insane changes in hospital policies at that time.  Patients on ventilators weren’t being adequately monitored, and in some cases, being totally ignored, as a way to comply with “social distancing” protocols.  Ventilators went from being an option of last resort, to the first option to treat a Covid patient.  I knew the protocols were having the effect of killing many patients, and suspect it was deliberate. After all, if the protocols are so ridiculous dangerous as to be that obvious to a layman, it should have been obvious to anyone who works in the medical profession.

[Author]

Posts