- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 4 days ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Dr William Makis is a Canadian Dr of oncology in Alberta Canada. In this interview on the Shaun Newman podcast he goes into detail as to what it is like to work in the medical field and how informed consent has been removed (if it ever was in place) from the patient, and how a diagnosis of cancer is a million dollar revenue stream for the medical establishment as well as the political and medical colleges that license doctors to practice medicine in Canada.
In this discussion he goes into detail on repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin and Fenbenzadole, and how there are numerous papers detailing the multiple ways these drugs can help eliminate cancer from patients in countries such as India and Mexico where “advanced treatments”, such as chemotherapy and radiation are unavailable. @Kevin 007 this might be helpful.
” how informed consent has been removed (if it ever was in place) from the patient”
It has not been removed. When it comes to adults, every patient of sound mind and body consents, and any true exception would likely result in a lawsuit and perhaps criminal charges. I have known many people that have undergone cancer treatments in the 2000s, including radiation and chemotherapy, and not one of them was forced to do the treatment, they all volunteered. They all chose to go to a doctor in the first place, they chose to accept their diagnosis and treatment, and they chose not to do any additional research via the internet or library or bookstore or asking questions or getting a second, third, forth or whatever opinion, or experimenting with some other method. In the United States of America, the people have the right to contract unlimited, and are sovereign. If you have those rights, you decide when you are adequately informed, not the doctor nor the government nor any third party payer like an insurance company. Correspondingly, you have to live with and are responsible for the results of those decisions. Because of that, there is always a presumption of competence, and something as simple as the doctor asking “Any questions?” is enough to proceed, assuming the person isn’t acting erratically.
Cancer treatments are expensive, ranging anywhere from $4,000-$50,000 per round, and perhaps more. People should look at this as a major purchase, along the lines of a car or house. They often don’t, however, as a third party payer is usually footing the majority of the bill. There is no doubt that the medical cartel is very happy with people ignorantly making decisions about high cost cancer treatment, but the final responsibility has to remain with the patient, as it’s his/her life, and they are the ones in control of it.
Well said Zack.
But isn’t over prescription of pharmaceuticals one of the top five leading causes of death in the United States?
I agree with vetting everything a doctor wants you to put into your body or procedures they want you to undergo. But I think that there is a stumbling block where people believe that the medical industry is concerned primarily about the patient’s health, forgetting that it is an industry and the primary concern is sales of products and procedures. So when fear mongering enters that equation, the pathway to willful compliance becomes smoother.
While there aren’t good numbers on that sort of thing, I think that over prescription of drugs is very likely one of the top five causes of death. And I do agree with people’s views of the medical industry being a stumbling block as well. People do put a lot of faith into that industry that it clearly doesn’t deserve, even though they have a dark history, and all sorts of modern day questionable practices. I’ve known people who said they were strongly against big pharma, but yet were also very pro vaccine, often mocking anyone who questioned them. It’s like they didn’t realize that major pharmaceutical companies are also in the business of making vaccines. Ryan Long has an excellent bit about this-
Of course, everything I said applies to doctors and other healthcare workers as well. No one forces them to be doctors, and if they start suspecting that they are taking advantage of uninformed people, they can change their ways, including leaving the medical profession and giving up their license. I believe Dr. Tom Cowan did exactly this. Freeway Ricky Ross did an interview with Patrick Bet David a while back. In the 80’s, he was large dealer of cocaine. At first, he didn’t think he was doing anything morally wrong, just helping people to have a good time. As he saw that it really was destroying people’s health and lives over the years, he realized he had to change what he was doing, his story is interesting and that interview is well worth listening to. If a dealer of illicit drugs can do such a thing, certainly dealers of legal drugs can do the same.
I’ve also posted this clip from Boston Legal before. Here was a fairly successful show on a major network calling some attention to some of the big acknowledged scandals in the food and health industry, again showing that while lobotomies and electric shock may be things of the past, dangerous medical practices are not-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Author
J.R.K