- This topic has 15 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Well…I never thought I would see this in a research study. #raypeatrightagain
Ignore the climate nonsense:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241126191736.htm
@Cari can you approve this post? Thank you from #yourproblemchild lolol.“Almost all biologists think of the organism as a machine, regulated by information according to innate programs. When it comes down to the details, their explanations sometimes make Rube Goldbergs imaginary contraptions seem elegant. At their best, they usually rely on some mysterious things called ionic pumps, that perform active transport, powered by little motors, under instructions from molecules that act on their specific receptors. When things get unmanageable, the biologists speak of paradoxes.”
– Ray Peat
Nice find, Lollipop. Certainly reminded me of that quote from Ray Peat, how biologists would rather start throwing around the term “paradox,” rather than consider that their hypothesis is partly or completely wrong.
“It might be wrecking the climate, but carbon dioxide is actually good for your cells”
So, how exactly, would Carbon Dioxide be “wrecking” the environment, then? Pretty much everyone knows that CO2 is essential for plant life, and it’s well known that when levels rise to almost triple the atmospheric amount (1000 ppm), those levels are highly beneficial to plant growth.
So now that they are admitting that higher levels of CO2 are beneficial to human and animal life, what, exactly, is “wrecking” the environment? Life itself? Is their goal a fully dead planet, with no green areas, just brown dirt?
“But there’s a catch. In the presence of carbon dioxide — that pesky gas disrupting global climate systems — our cells gain a secret weapon in the form of bicarbonate which helps keep pH levels balanced.”
“So many diseases, so many conditions have oxidative stress as a component of disease. That would include many cancers, effectively all age-related diseases, a lot of neurological diseases,” Burrows said. “We’re trying to understand cells’ fundamental chemistry under oxidative stress. We have learned something about the protective effect of CO₂ that I think is really profound.”
Yeah, such a “pesky gas” that’s keeping all plants alive, and has the potential to cure/eliminate cancer and most other age related diseases, and greatly extend the life and health span of all living humans and animals. Guess it’s time to coin and start speaking of “The Carbon Dioxide Paradox.”
The article does bring up one excellent point about In Vitro experiments. These experiments frequently show effects that either don’t show up within an organism when the same sort of challenge is presented. CO2 concentration is obviously a big one that they are pointing out, but there could be thousands of other unidentified factors altering such experiments. That’s why all In Vitro experiments should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
A great article <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Lol”>@Lollipop</span>, CO2 has been demonized unjustly but is part of our zeitgeist at this point in time. It will take time, but perhaps other dangerous medical favourites such as nitric oxide will also fall out of favour as well as CO2’s veil lifts.
Nice post Zack – yeah the “pesky gas” driving the “Carbon Dioxide Paradox” sums up the article quite well. The sentence you bolded from the article about cancer and age related diseases caught my eye as well…basically an admission, round about of course, of bioenergetic foundation of health.
J.R.K. Let us see if those bozos in Congress accept Robert Kennedy’s nomination. If they do, I have a feeling more and more of these interesting studies will be performed and made public. Fingers crossed 🤞🏻
Haidut is now mentioning the CO2 article on his blog-
Study: CO2 may be “bad” for the climate, but is beneficial for humans
Lollipop, were you the reader that alerted him?
Oh, and in regards to the RFK Jr. nomination, I think there is a very good (like 80 plus percent) chance he is confirmed by the Senate. There is a Republican majority, and the party is much less establishment at this point, and the lockstep D opposition is no more, with some prominent D senators saying they will vote for some of his picks already. Plus, Trump has a history of standing by his nominees, even when it seems all hell is breaking loose, with Kavanaugh being the best example.
And even in the potential worst case scenario, where he somehow isn’t confirmed, the nomination itself has already spread a massive spotlight on the issues of vaccines and seed oils, raising the awareness of problems of these for those who were totally ignorant of the dangers. A drawn out fight in the senate would only serve to highlight those and other issues more, and RFK would be free to continue his fight as a private citizen, this time with even more support and awareness.
Hi @Zack Vegas, yes I was 😇. I still dialogue with Haidut over email. Have been for years. Funny enough, you had to alert me to what happened with Roddy. I wrote him my thoughts of support. Most of the time I discuss with him different studies. He is kind to respond as I know he gets tons of email…I try to be respectful and only write when I see a WoW study like this one.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Author
Mark