- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 4 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Dr Pierre Kory gives an overview of Ohio State University Medical Centers position of delivery of the COVID vaccines, and how and possibly why their policies are changing.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-148884779?r=15jhmy&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
In answer to the question posed by the title of the thread, I’m going to say “No.”
Pierre Kory speculates wildly based on the claimed fact that ONE specific location (the medical center) is not offering the vaccine to employees (which would suggest ALL employees of Ohio State, not simply doctors and nurses). There are many potential reasons why this particular location wouldn’t be offering vaccines to employees, and my top guess would be that they have a limited inventory at that location, and couldn’t serve both public demand and the potential number of employees that would visit the center. I don’t think either of Kory’s two possibilities are even possible, as if OSUMC Leadership had genuine concerns about the safety or efficacy of any product, they wouldn’t be offering it to ANYBODY. Considering the same screenshot offers several other locations (4 Express Care locations, and maybe some other Ohio State retail pharmacy locations), for *anyone* 18+ to go get a Covid vaccine (including Ohio State employees), it’s certainly not a move to keep anyone safe from the product.
In the United States, any policy on vaccine sale and distribution will begin and end with the FDA (unless Congress intervenes). Since Kory claims to be an MD that works or has worked within the medical system, his apparent lack of knowledge about the basic structure of the US medical system is itself alarming. He also appears to be a leader of the FLCCC, the group that still recommends the SSRI fluvoxamine as part of a treatment for the common cold (aka, COVID).
My original thought on this was, “extremely unlikely”, but since the articles contents were espousing this possibility I thought I would title it this way.
The FLCCC protocols have some red flag items in them that pop up at me. I am unsure in what way Fluvoxamine might be beneficial in anyway to treat what is deemed to be long COVID which seems to have all the hallmarks of an impaired metabolic rate, which includes in its symptoms depression and/or anxiety. Given that their ranks are still trained in the pharmaceutical company funded system, I suppose that they would treat in the way that they know how to.
There is still a lot of money tied up in this new but extremely flawed platform. Given the influence of those invested in this venture, the marketing slogan,”of a needle in every arm”, becomes a government priority when funding to election campaigns is on the line.
But an interesting notion that lawsuits from the survivors of those that passed as a result of the gene therapies or survived but are now injured as a result, as the reason for not offering the COVID-19 shots to those in the employ of the university. I thought that the PREP act might have absolved the University from responsibility for adverse events.
The only lawsuits he mentioned were about the mandates to take a Covid Vaccine, not around the vaccine itself. To the best of my knowledge, you can’t sue in regards to the Covid Vaccines or any vaccine that is on the CDC childhood list and/or has EUA authorization.
And again, there is nothing suggesting that Ohio State isn’t offering Covid Vaccines to it’s employees. Merely that they can’t get the vaccines at a specific location. On the contrary, the screenshot seems to confirm that Ohio State is indeed offering the Covid Vaccines to it’s employees, and everyone else in the general public, and many other locations.
There was one lawsuit filed by a widow that asked for an autopsy with staining for spike protein where the heart was full of spike protein. The next obvious question would be is there actually a protocol that is accurate and truthful for the presence of,”spike protein”.
“There was one lawsuit filed by a widow that asked for an autopsy with staining for spike protein where the heart was full of spike protein.”
Well, this is a third party claim with no source for the reader to check, so it’s hard to know any details about what the lawsuit was actually about, and what test may have been used to detect this alleged “Spike Protein.”
There has never been a large scale test to demonstrate whether any of the Covid vaccines even produced this alleged “Spike Protein,” despite it being the claimed mechanism of action for the vaccines. And since the Covid Mythology claims that the alleged SARS-Cov-2 virus contains the alleged Spike Protein, and that even those vaccinated can still catch Covid, it would be impossible to make any claim that a heart “loaded with spike” was caused by a vaccine. There have been over 111 Million detected Covid cases in the United States alone, which is roughly one third of the population.
Your points are all good and I have no argument with them.
My thinking on these gene therapies toxicity leans more towards the lipid nanoparticle and it’s zeta potential, as well as its chemical make up. Dr Malone stated that he gave up on the mRNA platform because they could not get past the toxicity issue in the lipid nanoparticle. My mind drew parallels to lineoleic acid and the other polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The zeta potential aspect is an interesting one, and I think that this might be a possible reason for the autism possibly S.I.D.S as well, seen in babies post vaccination.
I recall seeing on the RPF some points on blood clumping together and how various treatments such as chlorine dioxide would separate the blood cells. Since cancer is a metabolic disease the stress this clumping would cause would lead to hypoxia and most likely fibrosis leading to tumour formation. Again this is speculation on my part and I continue to follow these developments and observations.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Author
J.R.K