- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 hours, 30 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Dr John Campbell reviews the latest study from South Korea following cancer rates in those that took the experimental jabs and those that did not for a period of one year. The results published are alarming for those who were not paying attention to this.
Dr Andrew Kaufman does a short review as well.
While this certainly would suggests that avoiding the shots is a good thing, I would hardly consider the results “alarming.” This study uses the same Relative Risk Reduction chicanery that other studies do. The quote attributed to Mark Twain still rings in my head- Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.
If you look at the overall cancer chart, 30 people per 10,000 get cancer in the unvaccinated group, while 40 people per 10,000 got cancer in the vaccinated group. This is a difference of 10 per 10,000, or a paltry 0.1% Absolute Risk Reduction in the unvaccinated. Hardly earth shattering. It may be statistically significant, but it really isn’t clinically significant. The fact remains that 9960 people per 10,000 in each group remained cancer free, while an additional 10 remained cancer free in the unvaxxed group.
The cancer stats reported were interesting and thank you for pointing out the actual risk reduction stat <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Za”>@Zack-Vegas</span>. I think that the all cause mortality data might be a better measure regarding side effects but perhaps at this point in time it is a little premature to measure this for any real meaningful conclusions yet.
An interesting angle that I would like to see is a comparison as to how those that took the shots compare with the completely unvaccinated (ie never took any vaccines ever).
Have you heard of the study from Henry Ford Health <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Zac”>@Zack-Vegas</span>? It has never been released apparently because it was flawed. But as far as I know the study was never peer reviewed or released to the public. But it did show that there were no signs of autism or chronic disease in the unvaccinated group compared with the vaccinated group that showed multiple times higher levels of chronic disease in those that did receive vaccination on ten recommended schedule.No vaccines EVER? That’s a tall order these days. I (foolishly) took one flu shot in my adult life, but that was well over 15 years ago. I also believe I had the standard shots when I was a kid, but it was only like 6-8 or so, not the 72 like are given to today’s kids.
I had not heard about that study, so can’t comment on it.
Also, remember, even though the Covid vaccines are called “vaccines,” they aren’t like any other vaccine in history. They are really more of a novel drug. I don’t think vaccines are safe, and after looking into all the fraud around virology, think any “viral” vaccine couldn’t possibly do anything positive, health wise. But the more novel Covid “Vaccines” are far more dangerous, as proven by the VAERS data alone.
I tend to think that vaccines, when they have issues, would be similar to other poisons- their affect would be acute, and long term issues would be triggered in a fairly short amount of time, likely as a result of some short term effect. Like, if you broke a bone, that is an acute injury, but it could potentially have effects for months/years/decades depending on how it is set, heals, and so forth.
I had not heard about that study, so can’t comment on it.
This study was mentioned frequently in the congressional hearing entitled, How the Corruption of Science Has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines. By Aaron Siri a few times. I think that the point that the study was never peer reviewed or is available for the public is interesting given that there is a lot of people talking about how the study did not meet the institutions rigorous scientific standards. The same rhetoric and playbook used in the,”pandemic” regarding alternative protocols on repurposed drugs nutraceuticals.
The headline in the article is pure coincidence yet somehow appropriate for this forum <span class=”atwho-inserted” contenteditable=”false” data-atwho-at-query=”@Cari”>@Cari</span>
Rinse and repeat: US vaccine hearing on unpublished study debates same myths
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Author
J.R.K